spot_img
spot_img
26.5 C
New York
Thursday, September 19, 2024
spot_img
spot_img

WHAT THE BUSHIRIS HAVE ARGUED IN COURT IN THEIR APPLICATION TO HAVE THE EXTRADITION REQUEST DISMISSED ENTIRELY

The Bushiris arriving at the court

The extradition case involving Prophet Shepherd Bushiri and Prophetess Mary Bushiri returned before the Lilongwe Magistrate Court in Malawi this morning.

Senior Resident Magistrate Madalitso Chimwaza heard an application by Prophet Bushiri’s lawyer asking the court to entirely dismiss South Africa’s extradition request.

The Prophets are arguing that South Africa has consistently flouted laid out legal procedures in filing their extradition request.

Lawyer for the Bushiris, Wapona Kita told the Court that in terms of Extradition Act specifically Section 13, it is mandatory that an affidavit leading to extraditing a person must be authenticated.

Authentication, he said, is defined by the same act to require that judge must be satisfied with the document or affidavit that it purports to be what it seeks to achieve.

Alternatively, he added, a magistrate must have been satisfied as to authenticity of the document or affidavit or an officer of the court.

Further, Section 13 also requires the Minster of the concern country to place a seal on the document to further authenticate the document and in the absence thereof, such documentation and whatever contain in it as evidence becomes inadmissible in the courts of Malawi.

Kita, therefore, argued that extradition request tendered by South Africa cannot be admissible in the Court because it has not pass the test of presenting evidence as required in terms of Section 9(4) to bring or to extradite person of interest.

He, then, said the Magistrate Court cannot deviate from statutory provisions especially of presenting evidence to cause a person to be extradited.

He underlined that a creature of the statute, the Magistrate Court must comply and respect the higher court of the land and must on those basis dismiss entire extradition request permanently.

In his submission, Kita asked the Court to permanently dismiss the extradition request by South Africa because the evidence they used in their request cannot be admissible in Malawi courts as it has not been duly authenticated as required by the law.

Kita has also prayed before the Court not to allow the State to amend the substantial flaws in their request because extradition proceedings are special, they come to court after an order of the Minister of Homeland Security.

The State, however, has argued that though it agrees with Kita’s arguments, it does not agree with the application of dismissal but has asked the court to provide fresh directions.

Magistrate Madalitso Chimwaza has since adjourned the matter for ruling on 27 September.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest Articles